policy bases its raison d'etre for public (political) which should only pursue the common good and, therefore, in this respect, the honesty should be an indispensable prerequisite. Pursuing the idea of \u200b\u200ba society based on Platonic thought is dominated by people well in terms of integrity and morality, however, has always proved to be a utopia beautiful and good. The entire human knowledge of human history shows that this could never happen. Where you tried to form societies as well, the astute and unscrupulous individuals have used it merely as an instrument of power the issue of ethics of honesty, in an arbitrary way of appropriating resources. It is non-historic period where this has not happened. You can not divide the world into good and evil, black and white, in good and bad. At least not in an absolute sense. Common sense teaches every citizen of that equity does not exist, that the meritocracy is a nice word that sells books and win votes, that political corruption is transverse and that it is directly proportional the resources that the same policy controls. So if this is so the only way to limit (not eliminate completely, mind you), is to put more stringent constraints on the amount and use of resources belonging to the community, allowing scrutiny of the citizens through the same political transparency and to institutional bodies appointed to do the task of prosecuting those who deviate from this path of righteousness. Thanks to the dick, you say. But how do you manage to do all this?
Simple. Just getting up in the morning with the idea of \u200b\u200bbeing awake and want to stay all day. Just be aware. Just buy a newspaper websites in the Internet, watch television programs that are not all the same current. The latter is a requirement not to fall into the trap of purism was talking about. Strange to say but it is also the basic foundation where they can build their own critical evaluation, irrelevant to the current and sector policies, which too often results tend to manipulation. So what are you waiting for? Are you still here reading these few lines? Buy the newspaper, go fluttering his fingertips on the websites, sagittate the remote to TV channels and most importantly, let that be your idea. It 'hard, it is difficult, requires commitment and perseverance. Requires above all the ability to understand that the classic "so the politicians are all alike," or the equally highly popular "tinker all" are produced by the mere fact that we do not fully understand the tool that we have data for administrations: the politics. And not understanding, we can not do anything. So we raise Terga from the chair in the morning and we begin to know. Why today, take it in the ass, is a moment!
0 comments:
Post a Comment