[appears to be much less hectic than the statements that accompanied the nomination. Minister` s been distinguished by the many advertisements: the apron, the voting behavior. In fact, the reform has removed the three years 85,000 teachers and 44,000 administrative, cut 8 billion of financing to the school and a billion and a half at the University. I remember an interview with him in a humiliating `Eastenders` "Minister, it is true that she dismisses 25,000 teachers? Answer: No, we do not lay off anyone. The citizens must know that this year there are 25,000 teachers in less our schools. " Be polite
us feedback two proposals as "schools with the stamp" or `regional register of teachers.
The school with the label `is yet another advertisement of this government because the stamps can take the whole of Italy if he is able to compete with countries of equal quality and good citizenship in Europe and elsewhere. If we better prepare teachers not only with a degree but with training
targeted teaching methods in order to avoid high chair if you can not teach and we should not distribute stamps of quality. For books regional clearance if there were behind a decision that if it is an ideological one must have the courage to say so. However, if the problem is ensure continuity in teaching we `d agree, it is inconceivable that a teacher you think you can do this job just behind the house. As with other state `s office is covered for at least five years in the place of destination.
Among the players at the school many students, teachers and staff do not consider these strategic changes, instead of complaining about a lack of resources for funding cuts that made an impact on teaching in depth.
Minister insists that the funds do not create quality and you can do a reform that improves the quality, `a statement so far unsubstantiated. Take the issue of foreign language in the primaries. If it is given by the teacher only one who has done a course of 150 hours instead of a language teacher I wonder if we have done everything possible in the best way to teach languages. Another example: in high school is abolished the hour of geography as the world becomes more and more geopolitical location. How can you leave out the information on States' increasingly present in international events, which change on nations and capitals, and whose name is linked to our economy? More fathom the more we realize that reform is not just a matter of cuts, we find the precise plan to downgrade the public school to school remaining. There, the parents must pay for toilet paper, teaching aids, tools that so far the state guaranteed minimum. A real ideological attack, more than sticker. Last
Financial hijacked € 130 million on private schools while 300 million euro earmarked for state institutions will be used for the safety of buildings. At this rate, the school threatens the `sinking? After the earthquake
Aquila Minister had caught the alarm, and it did add to the budget share aimed at putting into safety of school buildings. According to data provided by the Secretary Bertolaso \u200b\u200bthe necessary sum
amounted to 7 billion euro, has been allocated no more than 300 million, making an easy to understand how the division will go to € each school. The public school is under slap of Finance Tremonti-Gelmini, call it like this because usually the head of each department struggle with the Minister of economy to rip a little more instead Gelmini `s accepted it with my eyes closed. The Budget has only taken to the Italian school, the same 130 million that you quote for private institutions have been announced and not bestowed.
Minister calls for rewarding teachers of meritocracy, a guarantee to the quality of education that is lacking for too long. What do you think?
opposition on this point as we have delivered a favorable opinion of all. The Ministry would also have to begin to establish a meritocracy by giving some extra money this year paycheck more. By what criteria? through evaluative rankings. `But the law, to the agency, authority, was not put in working order. The Ministry has distributed 7% of ordinary funding to universities using the criterion of the so-called virtuous CIVR three years ago, but in the last three years have benefited the universities could no longer be so virtuous. When the `Invalsi lAnvur for school and for university research and develop the rankings then you can judge the government by the facts, which always prides itself rather than by his words.
The university reform in the Parliament `s will point to a reorganization by the accounts in your pocket with the rectors and possibly combining the sites, nationalization of a good bike or not?
There are too many facts to offer degree courses and too many chairs to set up branch offices extent of territory that they only inflate costs, streamlining everything there is d 'Agreement. But if we look at reform based on 171 standards, and a dozen delegations are often the annoying repetition of the concept "without additional burdens of public finance." Not only that but the Minister in charge of the economy put in hand a set of criteria that influence the so-called governance. A `free university does not respond to commercial purposes and territorial model proposed. The reform shows a central vault does not guarantee that the `autonomy enshrined in the Constitution. But
ratings and checks on the effect involved in teaching should be a sign of seriousness as well as the allocation of teaching posts' under public procedures for the selection. The
also support us: Controls on the allocation of teaching must be clear and go to an agency, third. As opposition, we believe that recruitment must be based on `a` national certification, you must create a list of teachers and based on what each university who wants to call. We must also leave the logic that sees teachers anchored to a single university from where they begin their careers up to the attainment of the chair, it is hoped the movement of teachers and a share of lectures could be related to results achieved, then ensure that the university would become dynamic check for yourself.
Complaints come from research where you've provided for those who fear the "term" of three years plus three that, again the question of funds, puts at risk the continuity of `office. Researchers offered
chronic insecurity. After six years of the contract will have access to a competition for the chair, but if there will not be available to remain precarious. We demand that the government achieves a transitional provision and a stabilization of researchers who want to stay in the university prior authorization.
From elementary to the university the very tip of Italy on education, and will stand the comparison with the planned migration of the brain that are from the East? The problem is not just ours, is at least in Europe. Yet there are conditions where our brains know very well compete with Indians, Pakistanis and everything is. As opposition, we believe that with these reforms, with cuts in Italy `s research is not responding even more to the provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon: to build the most competitive knowledge society in the world. ]
source senatoripd.it
interview of Henry Campofreda - Terra
0 comments:
Post a Comment